UAC not a security feature?

Latest post 02-20-2007 2:06 PM by Corrine. 1 replies.
  • 02-19-2007 9:27 PM

    UAC not a security feature?

    What are peoples take on the press lableing UAC not a security feature, or
    insecure by design?

    thoughts?


    --
    Josh
    http://windowsconnected.com
    Josh
    http://windowsconnected.com
    Josh Phillips http://windowsconnected.com
    • Post Points: 16
  • 02-20-2007 2:06 PM In reply to

    • Corrine
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 01-27-2007
    • Upstate NY
    • Posts 185
    • Points 2,813

    Re: UAC not a security feature?

    I think it is stated best in Technet, User Account Control Overview, particularly the text that I placed in bold/italics:

    User Account Control: Delivering a More Secure Desktop

    The main goal of User Account Control is to reduce the exposure and attack surface of the operating system by requiring that all users run in standard user mode. This limitation minimizes the ability for users to make changes that could destabilize their computers or inadvertently expose the network to viruses through undetected malware that has infected their computer.

    With User Account Control, IT administrators can run most applications, components and processes with a limited privilege, but have "elevation potential" for specific administrative tasks and application functions.

    Conversely, when users encounter a system task that requires administrator privileges, such as attempting to install an application, Windows Vista will notify the user and require administrator authorization. This type of prompting helps ensure that users do not accidentally make modifications to their desktops. It also helps eliminate the ability for malware to invoke administrator privileges without a user's knowledge.

    There will always be the user who never scans downloaded files before installing, does not create a fresh restore point before installing and clicks away, allowing whatever prompts to proceed.  Microsoft and the security community cannot protect users against themselves.  Although UAC will make it more difficult for those of us who help users clean up infected computers (due to providing instructions on accepting prompts, rather like disabling real-time protection), particularly when specialized removal programs require elevated privilege.  However, in the long run, yes, I see the UAC as an available security feature.

    Compare System Privileges between Admin without UAC enabled and a standard user on Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate:

    Admin without UAC enabled:

    SeLockMemoryPrivilege
    SeIncreaseQuotaPrivilege
    SeSecurityPrivilege
    SeTakeOwnershipPrivilege
    SeLoadDriverPrivilege
    SeSystemProfilePrivilege
    SeSystemtimePrivilege
    SeProfileSingleProcessPrivilege
    SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege
    SeCreatePagefilePrivilege
    SeBackupPrivilege
    SeRestorePrivilege
    SeShutdownPrivilege
    SeDebugPrivilege
    SeSystemEnvironmentPrivilege
    SeChangeNotifyPrivilege
    SeRemoteShutdownPrivilege
    SeUndockPrivilege
    SeManageVolumePrivilege
    SeImpersonatePrivilege
    SeCreateGlobalPrivilege
    SeIncreaseWorkingSetPrivilege
    SeTimeZonePrivilege
    SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege 


    Standard user with UAC enabled:

    SeShutdownPrivilege
    SeChangeNotifyPrivilege
    SeUndockPrivilege
    SeIncreaseWorkingSetPrivilege
    SeTimeZonePrivilege

    There is a heck of a lot of leeway for malware to operate on the machine without UAC enabled. 
     

    Corrine Security Garden "The Mystical Rose" (a gif from a friend) Microsoft MVP. Windows - Security
    Filed under: ,
    • Post Points: 10
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS
Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems Themed By nb development