A Potential Dark Side of Volume Activation 2.0

In a press pass release yesterday Microsoft unveiled what it is calling the Windows Software Protection Platform.  It sounds like a really long name for an anti-virus program, but it is in fact an umbrella of technologies that Microsoft’s is going to use to protect Windows Vista, and over time other products, from piracy. These will include built in WGA for consumer SKU’s and for Volume License (VL) customers they will have Volume Activation2.0

 

Volume Activation 2.0 is the set of activation schemes that will be required of enterprise customers who use VL media. This media, largely a target of pirates, will now also require activation.  This activation will occur either to an internal service in the form of a Key Management Service (KMS) or over the internet to Microsoft with a Machine Activation Key (MAK).

 

The KMS role will be installable on Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, and Windows “Longhorn” server.  Volume license media will look up this service automatically via an SRV record in DNS or they can be manually pointed at a server.  This service will require a minimum of 25 clients or 5 servers to begin activation. Clients using VL media will check in with the server periodically, every two hours, until they have activated. Once activated, they will need to check in again with the server every 180 days.  So every machine that you build in this manner will need to have access to this server periodically.  Machines that will be off your network for a period longer than 180 days or never connected to your corporate network to begin with would need to use a Machine Activation Key or MAK.  

 

These MAK keys will be allocated a certain number of activations when generated. A machine that you input a MAK key on will then activate over the internet against a Microsoft servers and decrement the MAK Key’s license count.  These keys will prove an attractive target for people who traffic in windows piracy since they contain multiple activations.

 

Let’s assume you create a MAK that contains 500 licenses and you use it to activate one of your machines over the internet. This key for whatever reason leaks onto the internet. So, what happens when or if these MAK leak? Well your purchase agreement with Microsoft is for a certain seat count.  Today’s VL media makes this basically a trust scenario. You say you have 5,000 seats and pay for 5,000 seats.  There is no formal audit and you true up periodically. This key that you issued now gets used by 499 people on the internet and is no longer valid.  Who pays for those 499 seats?  Yeah, you guessed it: you are now potentially floating that bill for those copies of windows.

 

A number of things would have to have happen to make this a true scenario, like VL media would have to leak and a would be pirate would have to come up with a way to either social engineer a key out of you or capture it on input.  However, the likely hood is certainly there and so not only does Volume Activation 2.0 mean more work and more infrastructure to support, it also appears that you could be paying for someone who is pirating windows.


Posted Oct 05 2006, 10:35 AM by Josh Phillips Did you enjoy this article? If yes, then subscribe to our RSS 2.0 feed

Comments

Tutor wrote re: A Potential Dark Side of Volume Activation 2.0
on 10-05-2006 12:39 PM

How about installations in virtual machines? I use a few installations for testing purposes.

What if an installation gets corrupted or lost? How do I get that license back on the server?

What an immensely annoying topic to deal with. Certainly won't spur Vista's adoption.

Josh Phillips wrote re: A Potential Dark Side of Volume Activation 2.0
on 10-05-2006 12:47 PM

Tutor,

VL media won't need to activate for 30 days.  If is a short term test you would never need to activate.  If you have network access from the VM you can hit the KMS without a problem.  VM's don't count to your intial 25 license count, but can activate.

The only problem area would be an isolated VM (or a "clean" network) which you would probably need to use a "proxy" MAK activation.

Mark wrote re: A Potential Dark Side of Volume Activation 2.0
on 10-05-2006 1:51 PM

The scenario that is see if an increase in computer theft.  I work for a construction company with machines scattered all over the state.  Trailers get broken into and machines get stolen.  I see theft going up because of the hopes of getting a license number with activations left on it....

Thomas wrote re: A Potential Dark Side of Volume Activation 2.0
on 10-09-2006 2:06 PM

Any links on how KMS administration would be possible ?

How about removing a computer hence a license ? in KMS or with MAK ?

Thomas wrote re: A Potential Dark Side of Volume Activation 2.0
on 10-09-2006 3:06 PM

Replying to myself.

I found the following on removed computer on this page :

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2024801,00.asp

"It will help them to know that every client that validates properly has a kernel with integrity. It represents a first-level health check," he said. "Also, they don't need to worry about rogue machines from ex-employees wandering around because they'll go dead after six months."

Josh wrote re: A Potential Dark Side of Volume Activation 2.0
on 10-09-2006 4:42 PM

Sorry thomas.....but that statement that will go dead is only true of KMS activated machines.  MAK will never phone home again....is my understanding.

Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems Themed By nb development