What Microsoft can learn from Moblin

Living in a material world, and I am a material girl.  Those infamous words from Madonna's Material Girl can be slightly tweaked to sum up my operating system perspective: living in a Windows world and I am a Windows guy. But I'm writing this post from within Moblin running on the new Asus Eee PC I got for Christmas (thanks, mom & dad!). 

You might have heard about Moblin in discussions about netbooks and netbook operating systems. But for those who don't know, Moblin started as an Intel project to develop a version of Linux built around the Atom processor and netbooks.  The goal was to develop an operating system that minimized boot time, increased battery life, and provided an Internet-centric user experience designed for small screens.  The project has since been turned over to the Linux Foundation; however, Intel employees still dominate the project's steering committee.

The notion of a lightweight Linux distribution on a netbook is as old as netbooks themselves. Asus' original Eee PC shipped with a lightweight, relatively user-friendly version of Linux.  Although the original Eee PC was a relative success, netbooks didn't really take off until they started shipping with Windows XP.  In fact, consumers who purchased Linux-based netbooks often returned them for Windows-based netbooks.  My particular Eee PC shipped with Windows 7 Starter.  I've been using Windows 7 for a while and running Windows XP on my netbook seemed like a step backwards.  However, I was intrigued by Moblin and wanted to test it out.  So, I now have a dual-boot setup with Windows 7 Starter and Moblin.

Of course, other netbook-oriented versions of Linux have sprouted up, many with the Ubuntu distribution as a base, such as Ubuntu Netbook Remix and Eeebuntu.  There is even an Ubunto Moblin Remix.  Although these OSes have their merits and I intend to play around with them more, I'm not as intrigued by them and probably will stick with Moblin as my Windows alternative.  Why?  Well, it mainly has to do with the premise of their design: take the most popular desktop Linux distro and adapt it for smaller-screened devices.  Certainly not a bad goal, but the end result essentially is Ubuntu with a type of "dock" designed to minimize the need for the standard, full desktop by providing a one-stop shop for the most commonly used applications and tasks.  While you could argue that Moblin essentially does the same thing, the difference is that Moblin was designed for netbooks from the ground up instead of from the top down.  This might seem like semantics, but the difference is that Moblin doesn't feel like Linux whereas the other distros do.

With Moblin, the design team rethought the purpose of, and even the very need for, a desktop.  In fact, Moblin basically attempts to hide the desktop at every chance it gets in the hopes you'll forget why you needed it in the first place.  And so far, they've succeeded.  If you accept the premise of Moblin and can leave your desktop OS "baggage" behind, you'll find that your expectations are different.  Because you're not expecting a typical desktop OS, you're more patient and willing to learn the Moblin way of doing things.  In fact, you may even appreciate the Moblin way of doing things.  At least I did.

The other netbook-oriented distros still feel like Linux and ultimately lead me to the same thought I have when using their desktop counterparts: why not just use Windows?  Now before you start extolling the virtues of Linux to me, don't get me wrong: I can appreciate Linux, and the geek in me enjoys learning about and playing with other OSes as my Moblin usage hopefully demonstrates.  But Windows, Linux and Mac OS are pretty much just different ways of doing the same things.  So, from a purely pragrmatic standpoint, if one is working for you, why go through effort to learn a different OS?  That type of "comfort intertia" is partly why Windows has remained dominent on the desktop.

But with Moblin, the experience feels fresh.  Using it makes me think of netbooks less as scaled-down computers and more as purpose-built devices--kind of like mobile Internet devices (MIDs) that Intel envisions everyone using.  It's this type of fresh experience that I hope Microsoft pays attention to.  I think MS did a great job with Windows 7 and Windows 7 Starter works well on my netbook.  Asus even implemented a cool fast-boot feature in the BIOS that speeds up boot times (though I lost this feature after setting up the dual-boot).  The result is that Windows 7 boots up pretty darn fast--maybe not quite as fast as Moblin, but close.  And of course, starting up from standby is very fast.  And perhaps most importantly, I'm comfortable and confident with Windows. 

But Windows 7 Starter is still a full-fledged desktop operating system.  And as more of our computing experience occurs on Internet-centric devices like netbooks and smartphones and more of our application needs move to the Web, Microsoft needs to rethink the Windows user experience.  It's simply not enough to adapt Windows to these devices.  Rather, MS needs to figure out how these devices can leverage the benefits of Windows while providing a user experience optimized for the particular device being used.  Apple did this with the iPhone and we've all seen the response.

At the same time, Windows has that comfort inertia and that isn't necessarily a bad thing.  People tend to gravitate towards what they know, which can be a huge competitive advantage since virtually everyone has used Windows at some point.  However, balancing familiarity with change is not an easy task.  In fact, after polling some of its user base (i.e., the enterprise space), implementing any change can prove a challenge.  Yet, if Microsoft can pull it off, it can extend its leadership into the next decade of computing experiences despite increased competition from Google and Apple.

So, if you were lucky enough to get a netbook this holiday season, I encourage you to check out Moblin.  If you don't want to install it, you can throw the live image on a bootable USB drive, boot it up, and play around with it.  Moblin.org provides easy instructions for doing this.  And if you already have tried Moblin, what do you think of it?


Posted Jan 01 2010, 08:24 PM by Brad Moczik

Follow Me on Twitter

Did you enjoy this article? If yes, then subscribe to our RSS 2.0 feed or

Comments

What Microsoft can learn from Moblin | Explore Mobile Answers wrote What Microsoft can learn from Moblin | Explore Mobile Answers
on 01-02-2010 4:07 AM

Pingback from  What Microsoft can learn from Moblin | Explore Mobile Answers

Matt Freestone wrote re: What Microsoft can learn from Moblin
on 01-02-2010 8:28 AM

If I remember correctly (and I could be wrong) I think the Origami project was Microsoft's attempt to create a new UI on top of Windows for internet centric devices.  From what I heard it had huge potential but it ended up getting dropped as a project.  Not sure why, but I'm pretty sure there were some releases/devices that ran it.

Brad Moczik wrote re: What Microsoft can learn from Moblin
on 01-03-2010 10:12 PM

While such a project might not be a bad idea, I don't find it as necessary with Windows as with Linux.  Because the standard GNOME or KDE desktop would be foreign to most users, netbook OEMs had more of an incentive to create a launcher dock to basically hide the fact that the netbook was running Linux.  Furthermore, not running Windows could be seen as a competitive disadvantage, but if netbooks OEMs could provide the user with a cool-looking, easy-to-use interface for Linux, people might not care as much.  

With Windows, I don't see as much of a need for a launcher as it already has one that is familiar to most people: the Start menu.  And with the icons and taskbar at least appearing larger in Windows 7, I think the standard UI works well enough.  That said, I think desktop interfaces need to be re-thought overall, and that's what I think Moblin attempts to do.  Designers need to take a step back and think of how computer usage has changed and whether typical desktops and nested folder and file structures still make the most sense.  Is that really the best or easiest way for people to work with files?  Application installation and management also need to be revisited.  In a way, Google is doing this with the Chrome OS, but to me, it is more or less circumventing the problems versus solving them.

RobertK wrote re: What Microsoft can learn from Moblin
on 01-29-2010 1:23 PM

Brad I agree that for netbooks Windows 7 is good but Moblin has the fast start and makes the netbook less of a computer and more of an appliance.  This is the way tablets/slates are going to go I think.  I don't think a regular Windows desktop would work well with a tablet/slate computer.  This is one reason why I think tablets haven't sold very well.  Using a tablet/slate computer and having to press the start menu wouldn't seem right.  A new finger friendly more cell phone UI would need to be used to make a better familiar environment for people.  This is what Apple did right with the iPad...which by the way I hate because it has so many negatives.  Other slates coming out like the one from MSI and the combo netbook/slate from Lenovo are interesting ideas.  You take a slate and you just make it feel finger friendly and make it familiar and give it new use.  

Maybe MS will do the same with slates and use WM 7 instead of Windows 7.  One thing I'd like them to do though is make a more MS Surface environment.  I don't expect them to make a device that does what Surface does but one that has a similar environment.  One in which you can for example bring up a picture and if you want to edit it, instead of going through menus, you just hold your finger on it and it brings up a circular menu of options...same with editing a document....highlight the word or paragraph and hold your finger their for a second to bring up options.  If you want to bring up a program just have a button that brings up program icons in tabbed format...for example have a tab for games, one for internet, another for productivity...etc. If they do this the slate would feel more like an appliance than a computer which would make sense.

Now with what I see with Courier I think that may be going in an interesting direction.  The UI looks new and fresh, easy to use and multi-functional.  If it comes out it could be an ebook reader, or doctors could use it to view and compare notes and xrays easily, engineers could do the same with plans and virtual models.  If done right this could be a huge leap ahead of Apple and the ipad.  

One OS that I think would make a pretty good slate OS would be WebOS.  It has everything a good slate would need, its simple to use, and it has great multitasking and synergy.  It would be interesting for sure to see if Palm thinks the same way...or maybe they'll license the OS to companies to make slate computers.

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Remember Me?
Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems Themed By nb development